When the news broke about the Washington Redskins trade offer, many Bengals fans, including myself, thought we were out of our minds not to accept it. After further thought, the salary cap implications require deeper consideration. Washington's trade offer would allow us to receive the 21st overall pick this year and a conditional 2009 3rd round pick that could potentially become a 2nd rounder if he has 80 receptions next season, or even a 1st rounder if Chad catches 95 balls in his new home. But not only would we have the $8.03 million in dead money as a result of dealing Chad, we would also be on the hook for an additional expensive first round contract.
However, with some simple moves, trading Chad Johnson is entirely possible. The worry is that the Bengals front office is not considering all factors, including cost cutting measures that should be taken anyway after the draft.
Designate the Trade as a Post-June 1 Transaction
First and foremost, the transaction would have to be designated as a post-June 1 transaction so that we could split the salary cap hit between this year and next. According to some estimates, that would reduce the salary cap hit from $8.03 million to a manageable cap charge in the neighborhood of $3-million for 2008.
Cut Replaceable Players
Secondly, we should be getting rid of some expensive, replaceable players. This should be done regardless of whether we trade Chad Johnson and hopefully, our front office is thinking along these lines. For example, if we get Sedrick Ellis or a solid Defensive Tackle in the second round, we should release Defensive Tackle,
John Thornton, which would save $4 million in salary. Similarly, if we are comfortable with any Safety or Cornerback that we get in the draft, we should consider cutting Dexter Jackson (which would save $1.25 million) and/or Deltha O’Neal (which would save $1.77 million). The point is that these players potentially can be replaced with younger guys for a lower cost without a significant drop in performance. Let’s face it, our D-line has been terrible for years so how good could John Thornton be? He has not gotten to the Quarterback. Our D-Line has been terrible against the run and he has not demanded additional attention to free up our Defensive Ends and Linebackers. He’s certainly not earning his current salary of $4.625 million. We should have gotten rid of Thornton awhile ago and we certainly should if we get finally get the DT we’ve been looking for in the draft. Now, more than ever, if we decide to trade Chad, Thornton should certainly go.
Similarly, if we wind up taking a Cornerback or Safety because of value that cannot be passed up in the 2008 draft, Dexter and/or Deltha should potentially follow. We have two young promising safeties and two young starting Cornerbacks and we only have both Dexter and Deltha for one more year. They will eventually need to be replaced after this year anyway. Deltha is currently the Nickel Back and should we obtain a Cornerback that can fill that spot and back up Leon Hall and Jonathan Joseph, waiving Deltha O’Neil and saving $1.77 million should be strongly considered.
Finally, on the off chance Darren McFadden falls or we feel we are getting value at running back in the second or third round, cutting Rudi Johnson should be a consideration as well (which would save $2.95 million). Again, all of these moves should be considered whether we trade Chad Johnson or not. These players are not performing up to their salary levels and can be replaced with younger, cheaper players.
Consider Trading Him for 2009 or 2010 picks
Moreover, if the Redskins did offer this compensation but we simply cannot afford to pay two 2008 first round picks (even after making any sensible cuts), why not make the trade for 2009 or even 2010 first round picks? Surely these picks will help for the future and the salary cap hit could be absorbed more easily. If Washington is willing to give up this year’s first round pick and a 2009 conditional third round pick that could become a first round pick next year, they certainly would give up first round picks beyond this year’s NFL draft.
Trading Chad Johnson is entirely possible due to spreading the cap hit over 2 years, cutting replaceable players and potentially trading for future picks if accepting the Redskins' offer as-is doesn’t work financially. There seems to be a growing contingent of Bengals fans that would like us to not budge from our position and let Chad Johnson hold out or sit on the bench for 3 years. While that sounds good for spite, payback and perhaps setting a precedent for other players down the line, it is simply not the best thing for our football team. Despite Chad’s terrible behavior of late, we will be losing a lot of his production on the field. We should absolutely get some value out of him and be certain to get multiple players that can contribute positively to our team and not behave like emotional toddlers. Also, the distraction of Chad can no longer linger. He has blasted the organization, Marvin Lewis and most recently, Carson Palmer. Even if we are calling his bluff and he reports to camp, the crowds at Georgetown and Paul Brown Stadium, the local media and fans throughout Cincinnati will not welcome him with open arms. Chad does not have the emotional strength to handle another negative season and will likely implode again if he gets back on the field in Cincinnati. Had we made this trade today, the CJ drama would have been over and we would have been salivating over who we would take with our new 21st overall pick.
Instead, yesterday, we chose to keep the problem on our team. Hopefully, our front office is taking advantage of the fact that this offer has been made public in an effort to attract other offers to make an even better deal on draft day. If this is the thought, it is a shrewd move and should be commended as we would be letting the situation develop rather than jumping on what was perhaps the first offer. Unfortunately, based on past history, that is not likely and these headaches will linger. I’m certainly rooting against history and for a trade, but the case against sound reason and logic is a strong one:
Exhibit A: Not accepting 9 draft picks from the New Orleans Saints and instead opting to draft Akili Smith with the 3rd overall pick of the 1999 NFL Draft.
Exhibit B: The Bengals tolerance of Corey Dillon and Carl Pickens
But we, as football fans, love the NFL draft because it provides all 32 teams an opportunity to start making improvements. Here’s to hoping for change, ending the headaches, cutting ties with Chad Johnson and “blowing it up” like Marvin Lewis said we would. Since the end of the 2007 season, Chad has rendered himself useless to this organization and likely won’t positively contribute for the Bengals. We might as well get as much as we can for him.