No Need for WR in 1st Round
WhoDeyRevolution is not a dictatorship like the Brown
Regime, and thus I must respectfully disagree with Comrade Miller in his post
from yesterday that the Bengals should draft a WR at #9. Mr. Miller is correct in assuming that Mike
Brown and the Bengals front office have no ability or desire to shop around the
#9 pick to move up to guarantee they get either Dorsey or Ellis at DT, or move
down if both are
gone. Let’s not forget
that the Bengals had their sights set on CB Revis from Pitt in the 2007 draft and
Mike and Co sat on their hands and watched as the Jets traded up and snagged
him. And we passed on trading our 3rd
overall pick in 1999 for ALL of the Saints’ picks – Akili really worked
out.
So, I will concede that the Bengals are stuck at #9. If Dorsey and Ellis are gone by then, do the Bengals then draft a WR? No.
First, WRs are historically the 2nd hardest
position to scout, after QB. Comrade
Miller wants a WR who can “contribute immediately.” Take a look at my earlier post and see the
numerous busts of WRs taken on the 1st round – and many way after
the #9 pick.
Second, no WR is the consensus top WR available. Malcom Kelly is mentioned frequently, but his
temper tantrum blaming his disappointing 40 time (4.68) on the University of Oklahoma having him run a
different surface than he had agreed throw up some huge red flags. James Hardy from
Third, there are ALWAYS top WRs available in later
rounds. Look at Chad (2nd round) and TJ (7th round)
on the Bengals, or Steve
Smith (3rd round), T.O. (3rd round) or Donald Driver (3rd
Round).
Lastly, and most importantly, the Bengals will never compete for the Super Bowl if they continue to throw out subpar defenses. We have huge holes at DT, OLB and Safety. Even without Henry, we have 2 Pro Bowlers at WR. The Efocus needs to be on defense, defense and defense.

Comments